meta name="reverberation" content=""Then, what is Life?" I said . . . the cripple cast / His eye upon the car which now had rolled / Onward, as if that look must be the last, / And answered .... "Happy those for whom the fold / Of ... " .glitch { position: relative; } .glitch::after { content: attr(data-text); } ✨


moosearesocool:

nah m8 — byron is  already so self-centred in his poetical narrative, that it wouldn’t make much difference. someone like charles dickens on the other hand would be a fucking nightmare 

bironism:

this! like, if you loathe-hate byron’s persona instead of loving to hate him, you’re not likely to get past uh, line four or so. his online presence would probably feel like an organic extention to that, plus more inappropriate but not completely tone-deaf jokes. would get into feuds but give good callouts [yet probably couldn’t take one himself without it being ironically funny]. i’m absolutely biased here though. cheers!

#dickens on the other hand... should not talk beyond his books#i'm not sure he should be talking so much -in- his books (ayy eng lit blasphemy!!)#dickens would write those annoying af threads that have you scrolling forever if only to see the backlash#texts d'outre-tombe
  1. remy-labelle-art reblogged this from reesa-chan
  2. imjustusingthistolikeartists reblogged this from un-perrito-de-la-calle
  3. un-perrito-de-la-calle reblogged this from time-passes-byy
  4. time-passes-byy reblogged this from digitaleruckus
  5. wanderingcarmen reblogged this from digitaleruckus
  6. lilliesandwitches reblogged this from digitaleruckus
  7. hanabi-09 reblogged this from digitaleruckus
  8. alexanderboleyn18 reblogged this from digitaleruckus
  9. melpomenismask reblogged this from digitaleruckus
  10. sir-henry-may reblogged this from digitaleruckus
  11. digitaleruckus posted this